If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.
While what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further distance from them.
This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is also the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.