If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause issues for users.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the farther the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
However, safe distance to live from cell phone tower found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In safe distance from cell tower is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.